Purpose

10 asymptomatic DHCWs in the Oral Medicine clinic, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, with no history of documented COVID-19 infection or viral exposure, were enrolled in a study that interrogated DHCWs' perceptions of safety and adoption of risk mitigation behavior. Following a baseline survey, finger-prick blood samples were collected twice two weeks apart using an innovative microsampling technique that replaces the need for venipuncture. Samples were processed using an in-house ELISA assay to detect IgM and IgG directed against the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the Spike protein. Weekly Rapid Antigen testing of nasal swab specimens was used to document Antigen negativity during the study.

Condition

Eligibility

Eligible Ages
Over 18 Years
Eligible Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Dental healthcare workers (DHCW)s employed at Rutgers School of Dental Medicine

Exclusion Criteria

  • Previous participation

Study Design

Phase
N/A
Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
N/A
Intervention Model
Single Group Assignment
Intervention Model Description
Pilot study to assess feasibility of testing dental healthcare workers for seropositivity and antigen positivity for SARS-CoV-2 (Rapid Antigen point-of-care testing).
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None (Open Label)

Arm Groups

ArmDescriptionAssigned Intervention
Other
SARS-CoV-2 testing
There is only one arm in this study- the study is a non-randomized pilot. All the subjects will be tested for SARS CoV 2 viral Antigen and antibody to the virus as described.
  • Device: Testing for SARS CoV2 Antigen and Antibody
    Antigen testing: Rapid Antigen testing (Point-of-care) Antibody testing: ELISA testing of microsampling 'finger-prick' specimen DHCW Survey for adoption of risk mitigation practices and for perceptions of safety

Recruiting Locations

More Details

NCT ID
NCT05607147
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Detailed Description

10 asymptomatic DHCWs in the Oral Medicine clinic, Rutgers School of Dental Medicine, with no history of documented COVID-19 infection or viral exposure, were enrolled in the DHCW arm of the study. The DCHWs underwent triage that included self-reported symptoms, temperature check and obtaining a pulse oximeter reading at every study time-point (See DHCW Arm in Results Section). Weekly Rapid Antigen testing of nasal swab specimens was used to document Antigen negativity during the study (BD Veritor Plus Analyzer, BD Sciences). The DHCWs' perceptions of safety and adoption of risk mitigation behavior were interrogated. Following a baseline survey, finger-prick blood samples were collected twice two weeks apart using avolumentric absorptive microsampling with a Neoteryx Mitra cartridge device (https://www.neoteryx.com) device that allows for self-sampling by non-specialized personnel (https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.09.21260266). Briefly, this microsampler allows for volumentric absorption of 10-30 μl of blood depending on selected size. Following the collection, microsamplers were dried and kept within the protective cassettes at room temperature for maximum period of 2 weeks from the collection date. Each microsampler tip (20µl in the present study) was added to 200 μl VAMS extraction buffer (1x PBS (Corning) supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and 0.5% Tween20 (Sigma, MO, USA) in a 1 ml deep-well 96 well plate (Greiner bio-one-780261). The plate was then covered with an adhesive seal and incubated 16 hours at 40C on a shaker at 250 rpm. The resulting eluates were heat inactivated at 560C for 60 minutes and centrifugation to collect the supernatant (eluate). Eluates were further processed for an in-house ELISA assay to detect IgM and IgG directed against the Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein as described (https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.09.21260266)..

Notice

Study information shown on this site is derived from ClinicalTrials.gov (a public registry operated by the National Institutes of Health). The listing of studies provided is not certain to be all studies for which you might be eligible. Furthermore, study eligibility requirements can be difficult to understand and may change over time, so it is wise to speak with your medical care provider and individual research study teams when making decisions related to participation.